Everything Motorola Q  
Home Motorola Q Store Moto Q Software News Moto Q Blog Motorola Q Reviews Moto Q Forums FAQs Wiki Contact Us Everything Q RSS feed


Go Back   Motorola Q Forum | Everything Q > Wireless Carriers > Sprint

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2007, 05:58 AM   #1 (permalink)
 
shaun0207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 780
Thanks: 11
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
shaun0207 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to shaun0207 Send a message via Yahoo to shaun0207
Default Sprint - Windows 6 Upgrade: Bleak????

According to this email I got back from customer support, the WM6 upgrade doesnt look seem like its going to happen. Here's the message I got back from Sprint Customer Solutions. Can any of the reps that visit this site confirm this:

Re: Subject: ID # 20070409190227 (KMM31411780I123L0KM)


Dear Shaun,
Thank you for contacting Sprint together with Nextel. I will be happy to assist you regarding all your concerns.
Currently, the Moto Q does not have wireless backup feature. This phone works on Windows Mobile OS 5.0 with AKU 2.4 and is not upgradeable to Windows Mobile 6.
Further, this phone does not support Sprint Picture Mail and Sprint Video Mail.
Thank you for contacting us. Have a great day.
Angus D.
E-Care
Sprint together with Nextel
"Where our customers come first!"

Refer someone to Sprint and get $25.
Visit www.sprint.com/referralprogram for details.

Original Message Follows:
------------------------

Body:
================================================== ======================
Name: Shaun Richmond
Form: Ask A Question Learn OR Feedback and Suggestions - Learn
Topic: Products and Services
Contact Number: ================================================== ======================
Question: Hi:
Does the Moto Q have the wireless backup feature? Also will he Q be getting a upgrade to Windows Mobile 6? If so will this correct the problem with sending regular Picturemail?
================================================== ======================
************************************************** **
Additional Data
************************************************** **
SUB Topic : PictureMail
Selected Device: MOTO Q
Current Customer ?: Yes
shaun0207 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-10-2007, 07:22 AM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
rudeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Skaville, Skamerica
Posts: 24,389
Thanks: 230
Thanked 1,694 Times in 1,398 Posts
rudeboy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to rudeboy Send a message via MSN to rudeboy Send a message via Yahoo to rudeboy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaun0207 View Post
*SNIP*
Does the Moto Q have the wireless backup feature? Also will he Q be getting a upgrade to Windows Mobile 6? If so will this correct the problem with sending regular Picturemail?
bummer... i wonder though, how is the not being able to send MMS a WM5 issue, the Verizon Q's can.
__________________
later..
rb.


rudeboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 07:33 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 282
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 19 Posts
g-funkster is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rudeboy View Post
bummer... i wonder though, how is the not being able to send MMS a WM5 issue, the Verizon Q's can.
The email does not say it is a WM5 issue.
__________________

g-funkster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 07:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
shaun0207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 780
Thanks: 11
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
shaun0207 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to shaun0207 Send a message via Yahoo to shaun0207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g-funkster View Post
The email does not say it is a WM5 issue.
I think its more of a Sprint not fully using the device capabilities issue. Serioulsy thinking of switching to the PPC-6800 when its released.
shaun0207 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 07:59 AM   #5 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
rudeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Skaville, Skamerica
Posts: 24,389
Thanks: 230
Thanked 1,694 Times in 1,398 Posts
rudeboy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to rudeboy Send a message via MSN to rudeboy Send a message via Yahoo to rudeboy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g-funkster View Post
The email does not say it is a WM5 issue.
because it is not :}
__________________
later..
rb.


rudeboy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dbpaddler is on a distinguished road
Default

Just remember, you can talk to five different reps and get five different answers. I just talked to one rep about my 700p and he's saying he has experience with the phone and hasn't had any problems with it when the glaring problems are known and admitted by Palm. One reason why I'm contemplating the Q. The other tempting reason to switch is the upgrade to WM6, and others around here have said it would be coming out for the Q on Sprint and Verizon. Who knows.
dbpaddler is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:05 AM   #7 (permalink)
 
scubasteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Millville NJ
Posts: 825
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
scubasteve is on a distinguished road
Default

its not WM5 its sprint not having MMS capability with their Q. As for the reps, they wouldnt know if they were going to release an upgrade or not. until a decision is made they are as in the dark as we are and have to use their pre-programmed responses.
__________________
All right, brain, I don't like you and you don't like me - so let's just do this and I'll get back to killing you with beer. --Homer Simpson

Need a website built? Hit me up, looking to make some cash on the side filling my boredom...
scubasteve is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:14 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
blachole is on a distinguished road
Default

The Sprint reps most of the time don't know crap. I know more about certain phones I don't even own then they do. This is a waiting game because I'm sure they have not made a final decision on the upgrade to WM6. For them to say the phone is not compatible to upgrade to WM6 is complete BS. I don't get why it is so hard for these companies to have a dedicated team to work on making these phones better since it is up to the provider to edit the software. They only have a few handfuls of phones to support.
blachole is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:18 AM   #9 (permalink)
 
scubasteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Millville NJ
Posts: 825
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
scubasteve is on a distinguished road
Default

They want the speculation, its that simple. Plus it would cost them more money to train a new team or a certain group than to email out pre-made responses.
__________________
All right, brain, I don't like you and you don't like me - so let's just do this and I'll get back to killing you with beer. --Homer Simpson

Need a website built? Hit me up, looking to make some cash on the side filling my boredom...
scubasteve is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 11:21 AM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dbpaddler is on a distinguished road
Default

Because they really don't care about supporting the current stuff. They care about what's next that will make them more money. What new features they can add that they can bill for. Same reason why they don't give a rat's ass that the 700P has the same hardware as the 700w/x and it's not the most compatible with the Palm OS so it has glaring problems, but they sit and drag their feet in trying to fix it to give the people who dropped $600 (supposedly) on a phone something that actually works as it is supposed to. Instead, they're probably devoting their time to testing the 755p to see how well it works so they can appeal to all new customers that don't want to carry a phone the size of the 700, but will carry the next sized down. That means all new customers with all new lines and more money.

Motorola is a ton better than Palm in updating and supporting their products, but ultimately it comes down to the carrier wanting to implement it.

So all in all it's cheaper and more profitable to offer something new than actually fix the old.

That's my layman's opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blachole View Post
I don't get why it is so hard for these companies to have a dedicated team to work on making these phones better since it is up to the provider to edit the software. They only have a few handfuls of phones to support.
dbpaddler is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Integrated by BBpixel Team 2008 :: jvbPlugin R1015.37x.1