Everything Motorola Q  
Home Motorola Q Store Moto Q Software News Motorola Q Reviews Moto Q Forums Q Social Moto Q FAQ Contact Us Everything Q RSS feed


Go Back   Motorola Q Forum | Everything Q > Accessories > Motorola Q Accessories

Notices



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2006, 12:18 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ridiculogic is on a distinguished road
Default 4GB mini SD cards

So now that real 4GB mini SD cards are out, when will we be able to use them on our Q's? My understanding is that all future miniSD cards that are larger than 2gb will be a new format, called miniSDHC. I also understand that Motorola will have to upgrade the firmware in order for us to be able to use the cards in our phone. Till then, we're stuck with 2gb (which isn't bad, just not quite enough for the music/movies I want to watch).

The exciting thing is that this technology supposedly can take minisd cards up to 32gb, which would be awesome!

So anybody heard anything on this front? Is it true that we need a firmware upgrade to use the high-capacity cards?
ridiculogic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-14-2006, 09:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
robertguyser is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ridiculogic View Post
So now that real 4GB mini SD cards are out, when will we be able to use them on our Q's? My understanding is that all future miniSD cards that are larger than 2gb will be a new format, called miniSDHC. I also understand that Motorola will have to upgrade the firmware in order for us to be able to use the cards in our phone. Till then, we're stuck with 2gb (which isn't bad, just not quite enough for the music/movies I want to watch).

The exciting thing is that this technology supposedly can take minisd cards up to 32gb, which would be awesome!

So anybody heard anything on this front? Is it true that we need a firmware upgrade to use the high-capacity cards?
judging from other devices ive had it depends on more than firmware and new formats.. like a manufacturer trying to sell their next product and stop supporting past products... the new black q may help though... but i doubt it..

companies like to put new features on new devices.. it is too bad noone who knows more has responded.. where are the experts?

Still, I too am hopefull there will be a way to put more memory in this thing eventually.. i wonder if someone could make the usb port work for a memory module... that wm5storage program documentation hints that the USB IO lines are fairly flexible.

Last edited by robertguyser; 12-14-2006 at 09:35 PM. Reason: typo
robertguyser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 09:50 AM   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
braeleure2 is on a distinguished road
Default Q cannot do >2GB with current firmware...

Check:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...8081319AA0y68p
http://www.happytech.net/Articles/Ke.../Fat32Info.htm
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/file/partSizes-c.html
braeleure2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 12:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
robertguyser is on a distinguished road
Default

so, your idea is that fat dosent support disks over 2gb, so neither does wm5.

sad. MS. sad. real sad. why use the f'in DOS ddisk format? it is like 18 years old!
robertguyser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 01:19 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
dipgolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Fl & Oxford, MS
Posts: 124
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
dipgolf is on a distinguished road
Default

Yeah, these new cards are amazing. 32gb on a miniSD card, my first computer's hard drive was only 4gb. It's stupid that they force you to buy new devices in order to use them. I mean is it that difficult to make a patch or something to enable them to be used on current products?
__________________
Hotty Toddy.
dipgolf is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 01:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ridiculogic is on a distinguished road
Default

Motorola -- get on this ASAP!

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertguyser View Post
so, your idea is that fat dosent support disks over 2gb, so neither does wm5.

sad. MS. sad. real sad. why use the f'in DOS ddisk format? it is like 18 years old!
ridiculogic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2006, 01:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ridiculogic is on a distinguished road
Default

Wow. My first computer hard drive was 80 MB!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dipgolf View Post
Yeah, these new cards are amazing. 32gb on a miniSD card, my first computer's hard drive was only 4gb. It's stupid that they force you to buy new devices in order to use them. I mean is it that difficult to make a patch or something to enable them to be used on current products?
ridiculogic is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006, 07:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
robertguyser is on a distinguished road
Default

Weird really.. I didnt know FAT supported long file names.. as far as a patch or frmware update fixing the problem - i dont know. i have never had a PPC or smartphone device before. It would seem to me that if other WM5 devices support large memory cards, the OS itself can support larger cards. The specific factors could be alot more than just firmware though.. Like specific IO portions of the OS code that work only with different drive formats? I dont know.

The best thing would be for someone to try it!
robertguyser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006, 08:38 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Pony99CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 1,567
Thanks: 11
Thanked 133 Times in 95 Posts
Pony99CA is on a distinguished road
Default Bad Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertguyser View Post
so, your idea is that fat dosent support disks over 2gb, so neither does wm5.

sad. MS. sad. real sad. why use the f'in DOS ddisk format? it is like 18 years old!
You're worrying about nothing. Windows Mobile can support more than 2 GB -- I have an 8 GB CF card formatted with FAT32 in my iPAQ hx2795 running WM 5 to prove that. (I suppose that HP could have different drivers and that WM 5 itself doesn't support FAT32, but I think that's unlikely.)

However, the file system isn't the only important thing to consider. Some controllers can also limit how much data you can access. For example, my iPAQ 5550 running Windows Mobile 2003 worked just fine with my 2 GB SD card, but my Mobile Crossing Waypoint also running WM 2003 didn't see the card at all because its controller (or something in the system) was limited to 1 GB cards. My Fujitsu laptop can read and write to the first 1 GB of the card, but not the second.

The big question is whether Windows Mobile Smartphone's SD card support allows FAT32 and whether the Q's hardware and drivers support more than 2 GB. Unfortunately, I don't have a 4 GB MiniSD card, so I can't answer that.

As for SDHC, my understanding is that it's one part hardware (for speed) and one part software (for size). If SDHC cards basically just use FAT32, the Q may be able to support them (at worst with a software update). If the SDHC hardware is required, I doubt the Q will ever work with them (well, current Qs).

Caveat lector (or "Let the reader beware"): I'm a high-level software guy, not a hardware or driver geek.

Steve
__________________
Silicon Valley Pocket PC
http://www.svpocketpc.com

If somebody helps you, boost their reputation. Click the Reputation button icon under their user name.
Pony99CA is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006, 10:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
robertguyser is on a distinguished road
Default

from working with programminh more simple microcontrollers to access eeprom memory, i know that to make 'modules' that could be different size eeprom a routine to get total memory size is needed. because memory is in banks usually, the code has to do a bunch of little things. this code would be alot different for different data formats... i dont think you can use fat32 formated memory cards in the Q? surely someone has tried to stick their fat32 memory card into their Q?

my idea that it cannot do fat32 comes from using pocketDOS fdsik.

not a very good asumption really, as the makers of pocketdos may simply not have put in fat32?

dont listen to me!
robertguyser is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Integrated by BBPixel ©2003-2008, jvbPlugin
Android forums

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33