View Single Post
Old 02-23-2008, 10:20 AM   #7 (permalink)
KestrylR
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 32
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
KestrylR is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregm View Post
So, coincidently, I'm looking at the New York Times today - and what do I see? A picture of a phone that looks identical to my Moto Q, but from ATT (mine is from Verizon):

"Introducing MOTO Q Global, one of AT&T's fastest 3G smart devices. Equipped with GPS, Windows Mobile 6, ......, Access turn-by-turn GPS navigation, ...., "

Reading this, I conclude that my Verizon Moto Q is simply intentionally crippled. I have no intention of switching carriers, but I am a bit peeved with Verizon about this!

They aren't exactly lying, but they're not being very truthful, either. The GPS in my Q from ATT is just as crippled. This is one of the areas where the BlackJackII that I had for 3 days first was superior. The GPS in it worked just fine right out of the box. Google Maps' "My Location" worked just fine, no tweaking needed. All I can get from it with the Q though is "Your location is temporarily unavailable.". Yeah, "temporary" as in "until you cough up some more money either for the TelNav subscription or an external receiver."

integrated GPS, my @$$...
KestrylR is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Integrated by BBpixel Team 2008 :: jvbPlugin R1015.37x.1